Shell: Promises of safety not delivered
-
-
In 2009, Shell allegedly colluded with the Nigerian government to silence environmental and human rights activists in Nigeria’s Ogoni region, including its alleged direct involvement in the death of six activists.
-
-
In 1998, a blast at a Shell refinery in Washington State killed six workers. From 2004-2011, Shell continued to violate the state’s safety laws, racking up $150,000 in fines and penalties for exposing employees to explosions and toxic release hazards, and for a lack of proper safety equipment and training.
-
-
In 2010, an accident at Shell’s Draugen well in Norway damaged safety equipment, leaving only one barrier remaining to prevent a potentially disastrous oil spill. Shell claimed the incident was not “serious,” but the Norwegian Petroleum Safety Authority disagreed, calling it “major accident situation,” and citing a series of safety concerns.
-
-
In 2000, Shell settled a class action lawsuit brought by members of communities on the East Side of Cleveland. The communities alleged that Shell charged more for gas in predominantly black areas than on the city’s West Side.
-
-
Shell called it’s operation to mine tar sands in Canada a “sustainable energy source,” but the Canadian Advertising Authority says these claims misled the public.
-
-
The company’s North Sea operations have one of the worst safety records of any oil company operating in the UK, violating safety rules 25 times from 2005 to 2011 and resulting in at least £1 million ($1.5 million) in fines and legal costs. Just last year, Shell caused the worst spill there in a decade.
The company’s North Sea operations have one of the worst safety records of any oil company operating in the UK, violating safety rules 25 times from 2005 to 2011 and resulting in at least £1 million ($1.5 million) in fines and legal costs. Just last year, Shell caused the worst spill there in a decade.
From the report SHELL OIL: A record of environmental and corporate malfeasance.
